WHERE IT STARTED
FIRST SEEN: 1970s-early 1980s (US, after the Bank Secrecy Act) · GOING FOR: About 45 years
Structuring arose in the United States after the 1970 Bank Secrecy Act created the $10,000 cash-reporting rule; Florida drug investigators coined 'smurfing' in the early 1980s and Congress criminalised structuring in 1986.
Structuring became a crime because of the US Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, which requires banks to file a Currency Transaction Report for cash transactions over $10,000. Criminals responded by splitting cash into sub-$10,000 deposits, often using many runners - 'smurfs', a term coined by Florida drug investigators in the early 1980s. Congress made structuring itself an offence in 1986 (31 U.S.C. 5324), and the Supreme Court's 1994 Ratzlaf decision led to a 1994 amendment removing the need to prove the defendant knew structuring was illegal. The best-known conviction is former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, sentenced in 2016 for structuring withdrawals to pay hush money.
HOW IT WORKS
Cash from drugs, tax evasion, fraud or simply undeclared income is broken into deposits or withdrawals just under the $10,000 reporting threshold, spread across days, branches, accounts and people so no single transaction triggers a Currency Transaction Report. Modern variants use many low-value money orders, prepaid cards or crypto ATM purchases. Banks are required to file Suspicious Activity Reports on patterns that look like structuring, and those reports - not the CTRs the scheme avoids - are what usually lead to prosecution. Structuring is a crime even when the money is legal.
Repeated cash deposits of $9,000-9,900 over consecutive daysSame cash amount split across several branches or accounts on one dayCustomer asking about reporting thresholds or refusing to complete a CTRMultiple people depositing cash into one account in similar amountsCash business with deposits that never exceed $10,000 despite high turnover
HOW USEFUL IT IS TO CRIMINALS
It requires nothing but patience and, for large sums, a few runners; small operators split deposits themselves. It is effective against automatic CTRs but not against bank SAR filings, which flag the pattern, and because intent to evade reporting is enough, prosecutors often use it when they cannot prove the underlying crime (as with Hastert). Sentences for stand-alone structuring are usually months or probation.
THE DAMAGE IT HAS CAUSED
$1.7 million
Structured withdrawals in the Hastert case, the best-known conviction (no body publishes a total) — NPR, April 2016
No body publishes a total for structured cash; the offence is a reporting evasion and losses accrue to the underlying crimes (drugs, tax evasion, fraud). The most prominent case is Dennis Hastert's $1.7 million (2016); the largest recent pleas involve $250,000 to over $1 million. Non-money harm: structuring hides drug and fraud proceeds from investigators, and civil forfeiture of structured legal funds has drawn criticism from small-business owners.
$10,000 Cash threshold above which US banks must file a Currency Transaction Report (Bank Secrecy Act; FinCEN)
5 years Maximum prison term per structuring count (10 years if tied to another crime) (31 U.S.C. 5324; FinCEN case examples)
$1.7 million Hush money Dennis Hastert structured withdrawals to pay (NPR, April 2016)
WHO USES IT MOST
MOST OF ALL: 🇺🇸 United States ▸
Structuring is defined by the US Bank Secrecy Act's $10,000 reporting rule and prosecuted under 31 U.S.C. 5324; FinCEN publishes the case examples and banks file the SARs that drive enforcement.
United States (BSA/FinCEN regime; most prosecutions)Canada (FINTRAC C$10,000 threshold)Australia (AUSTRAC A$10,000 threshold)Mexico (cash restrictions on US-dollar deposits)
GOVERNMENTS LINKED TO IT
No government is documented as using this method.
NOTABLE PEOPLE WHO USED IT — RANKED BY PROFILE ORDER (NOT BY AMOUNT)
#1 Dennis Hastert CONVICTEDREPORT PENDING
About $1.7 million in structured withdrawals · 2010-2014
Former Speaker of the US House who pleaded guilty to structuring bank withdrawals to pay $1.7 million in hush money to a man he had sexually abused as a teenager; sentenced to 15 months in 2016.
SOURCE: NPR, 27 April 2016; ABA Journal
#2 Richard Kamolvathin (Zolvent Pro LLC) CONVICTEDREPORT PENDING
$363,800 restitution · 2022-2024
Business owner who pleaded guilty to structuring in September 2025 and was sentenced in December 2025 to five years' probation with $363,800 restitution.
SOURCE: FDIC Office of Inspector General / US Attorney's Office release, Dec 2025
#3 Abdel Elgendy CONVICTED (GUILTY PLEA, 2024)REPORT PENDING
More than $250,000 structured · 2021
Piscataway, New Jersey man who admitted structuring over $250,000 in cash deposits during 2021 to evade currency reporting.
SOURCE: IRS Criminal Investigation; US Attorney's Office, District of New Jersey, 2024
#4 Bakersfield business owner (structuring over $1 million) CONVICTED (GUILTY PLEA)REPORT PENDING
More than $1 million structured · 2019-2022
California business owner who pleaded guilty to structuring more than $1 million in bank deposits below the reporting threshold.
SOURCE: Bakersfield Californian; US Attorney's Office, Eastern District of California
SOURCES
NPR, 'Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert sentenced to 15 months in prison', 27 April 2016
ABA Journal, 'Federal judge calls Dennis Hastert a serial child molester, gives him 15 months in banking case'
FinCEN, law-enforcement case examples on structuring (chiropractor, service-company owner, mortgage broker)
FDIC OIG, structuring guilty pleas and sentencing releases, 2025
IRS Criminal Investigation, 'Middlesex County man admits structuring over $250,000 in deposits', 2024
Bakersfield Californian, 'Business owner pleads guilty to structuring bank deposits'
NETBankAudit, 'Structuring and smurfing explained'