WHERE IT STARTED
FIRST SEEN: 1880s-1890s (permissive incorporation laws); offshore boom from the 1980s · GOING FOR: Over 130 years (since the 1880s-1890s)
Paper companies became easy to create after New Jersey (1889) and Delaware (1899) passed permissive incorporation laws; the offshore industry took off with the British Virgin Islands' International Business Companies Act of 1984, and Panama's Mossack Fonseca (founded 1977) became the first notorious mass provider when the Panama Papers leaked in 2016.
Companies that exist only on paper became easy to create after US states such as New Jersey (1889) and Delaware (1899) passed permissive incorporation laws; offshore centres followed, notably the British Virgin Islands' International Business Companies Act of 1984. Shell companies are legal in themselves, but anonymous ownership makes them a favoured tool for hiding bribes, stolen money and sanctions evasion. The Panama Papers (2016) and Pandora Papers (2021) leaks, published by ICIJ, showed how widely they were used by officials and criminals. Cases such as Moldova's $1bn bank theft (2014) and Malaysia's 1MDB used chains of shells to move money. In the crypto era, shell companies with US bank accounts are used to receive and launder scam victims' funds, as in the Daren Li case.
HOW IT WORKS
A company is registered with nominee directors or hidden owners and no real business, often in a jurisdiction that does not publish ownership. It is used to open bank accounts, sign fake contracts or invoices, or pose as a legitimate supplier or investment. Money is passed through several such companies across countries so it becomes hard to trace to its criminal source. Victims may be sent to pay a 'company' account that looks legitimate but is controlled by fraudsters.
Company with no staff, website or physical officeOwners hidden behind nominees or offshore registrationsRecently formed company handling very large paymentsPayments routed through several unrelated jurisdictionsBeing asked to pay a company whose name differs from the one you dealt with
HOW USEFUL IT IS TO CRIMINALS
A company can be formed in minutes for a few hundred dollars with a nominee director, and layers of them across jurisdictions defeat most investigators; the Panama Papers alone exposed 214,000 entities. It is essential to laundering, bribery, sanctions evasion and tax evasion at scale, which is why 1MDB, the Moldovan bank theft and Prince Group all used chains of shells. Prosecution of the shells' users is slow and cross-border, and the formation agents are rarely charged; Mossack Fonseca's founders were acquitted in Panama in 2024.
THE DAMAGE IT HAS CAUSED
214,000+
Offshore entities exposed in the Panama Papers leak from a single formation agent — ICIJ, April 2016
UNODC estimates 2-5% of global GDP is laundered each year, much of it through anonymous companies, and the Pandora Papers (2021) showed 35 current and former world leaders using them. The largest single cases include 1MDB ($4.5 billion diverted through shells) and Moldova's 2014 'theft of the century', $1 billion or about 12% of GDP. The harm is lost tax revenue, corrupted governments and, in Moldova, a state bailout that impoverished the country.
214,000+ Offshore entities exposed in the Panama Papers (11.5m documents) (ICIJ, Apr 2016)
11.9m Records in the Pandora Papers leak on offshore companies and trusts (ICIJ, Oct 2021)
$1bn Stolen from Moldovan banks in 2014, about 12% of Moldova's GDP (AP, Apr 2023)
2-5% Estimated share of global GDP laundered each year (estimate) (UNODC)
WHO USES IT MOST
MOST OF ALL: British Virgin Islands
More than half of the roughly 214,000 offshore entities in the Panama Papers were registered in the BVI (ICIJ, 2016).
British Virgin Islands (major registry of offshore shells)Panama (Mossack Fonseca, Panama Papers)United States (easy anonymous formation in some states, e.g. Delaware)Cyprus (routing hub in the Manafort and other cases)Moldova (victim of the 2014 $1bn bank theft)
From our case files: every country the people who used this method were born in or operated from. Bigger and brighter means more of them; amber is the most. Tap a marker for the country page.
GOVERNMENTS LINKED TO IT
North Korea
UN Security Council Panel of Experts reports and US Treasury designations document North Korea's use of front and shell companies abroad to evade sanctions and launder funds, including stolen crypto.
SOURCE: UN Panel of Experts reports, 2019-2024; US Treasury OFAC
Venezuela
Alex Saab, an ally of the Maduro government, was charged in a US court over a scheme using entities secretly controlled by conspirators, fake companies and false invoices to win and skim state food-import contracts after bribing officials; he was freed in a 2023 prisoner swap. A reported 2026 guilty plea could not be sourced and is not stated here.
SOURCE: US DOJ (S.D. Fla.), Alex Saab indictment [SOURCE NEEDED: date and docket to be confirmed]
Malaysia (1MDB)
The US DOJ alleges funds from state fund 1MDB were diverted through shell companies, including one named to resemble a real Abu Dhabi fund; former PM Najib Razak was convicted in Malaysia over the funds.
SOURCE: US DOJ, 2016-2018; CNN, Dec 2025
NOTABLE PEOPLE WHO USED IT — RANKED BY PROFILE ORDER (NOT BY AMOUNT)
#1 Low Taek Jho (Jho Low) FUGITIVE OUR CASE FILE #014 ▸
$4.5bn (alleged misappropriated from 1MDB) · 2009-2015
Allegedly moved 1MDB money through a web of shell companies and offshore accounts to buy property, art and a yacht.
SOURCE: US DOJ, Nov 2018
#2 Ilan Shor FUGITIVEREPORT PENDING
About $1bn (bank theft) · 2014 (convicted 2023)
Convicted in absentia in Moldova over the 2014 disappearance of about $1bn from Moldovan banks via loans to connected companies; sanctioned by the US.
SOURCE: AP / Times of Israel, Apr 2023; US Treasury, Oct 2022
#3 Alex Saab CHARGEDREPORT PENDING
About $350m (alleged siphoned, per the US charges) · 2011-2020
Used fake and front companies and false invoices to skim Venezuelan state food contracts; charged in the US and freed in a 2023 prisoner swap. A reported 2026 guilty plea could not be sourced and is not stated here.
SOURCE: US DOJ (S.D. Fla.), Alex Saab indictment [SOURCE NEEDED: date and docket to be confirmed]
#4 Daren Li FUGITIVE OUR CASE FILE #026 ▸
$73.6m (victim funds; $59.8m via US shell companies) · 2022-2024 (sentenced 2026)
Laundered crypto-scam victims' money through US shell companies; fled before sentencing and was sentenced in absentia to 20 years.
SOURCE: US DOJ via CoinDesk, Feb 2026
#5 Paul Manafort CONVICTED
More than $30m (laundered, per DOJ) · 2006-2015 (convicted 2018)
Hid income from Ukrainian political work in offshore shell-company accounts in Cyprus and elsewhere; later pardoned (2020).
SOURCE: US DOJ (Special Counsel), 2018
OPEN REPORT ▸
#6 Jürgen Mossack (Mossack Fonseca) ACQUITTEDREPORT PENDING
n/a · 2016-2024
Co-founder of the Panamanian law firm at the centre of the Panama Papers; acquitted of money laundering by a Panama court in 2024.
SOURCE: AP / Reuters, June 2024
SOURCES
ICIJ, Panama Papers, Apr 2016
ICIJ, Pandora Papers, Oct 2021
US DOJ, 1MDB actions, 2016-2018
US DOJ (S.D. Fla.), Alex Saab indictment [SOURCE NEEDED: date and docket to be confirmed]
AP / Times of Israel, Ilan Shor sentence, Apr 2023
CoinDesk / The Record,
Daren Li sentencing, Feb 2026
US DOJ Special Counsel, Manafort, 2018
AP / Reuters, Panama Papers trial verdict, June 2024
UN Security Council Panel of Experts on DPRK reports
UNODC, money-laundering estimates